In 2025, organizations across industries are confronting a surge of regulatory volatility. From the European Union’s AI Act to the U.S. Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB) new policy on AI use, and from evolving ESG disclosure rules to cybersecurity reporting requirements, change has become the constant.
According to KPMG’s 2025 Risk & Regulatory Outlook, this is “the year of accelerated change,” where new laws, enforcement priorities, and cross-border data policies will reshape how organizations manage risk and performance.
This transformation is not just a compliance concern. Each regulatory shift forces updates in processes, systems, suppliers, data management, and internal controls—all elements at the heart of operational resilience. In other words: regulatory change is now an operational risk.
|
Content |
Every time a new rule emerges, organizations must interpret it, translate it into operational terms, and ensure consistent execution. When that doesn’t happen quickly or coherently, the organization absorbs hidden risks: process disruption, duplicated effort, control failures, or non-compliance penalties.
The Aon Global Risk Management Survey (2025) ranks regulatory and legislative change as the fourth most significant global business risk, emphasizing that “policy volatility reshapes decision-making, resource allocation, and strategic priorities”.
This reality is amplified by overlapping regimes. A financial institution may simultaneously face:
Each of these frameworks affects governance, vendor oversight, and reporting structures. Regulatory fragmentation has therefore become a measurable source of operational risk.
When compliance functions react slowly, the consequences cascade. The OCC’s 2025 Supervisory Priorities highlight that weak change-management processes and poor integration between compliance and operations have become leading causes of operational losses.
Fines and enforcement are only part of the cost. Organizations incur hidden losses:
The International Association of Risk and Compliance Professionals (IARCP) notes that the real expense of non-adaptation lies in “operational slowdown and strategic distraction”—a loss of agility that weakens competitiveness. The cost of falling behind is not only regulatory—it’s structural.
To move from reactive compliance to proactive resilience, organizations must embed Regulatory Change Management (RCM) inside their enterprise risk architecture.
This is no longer a reporting exercise—it’s a dynamic process that connects regulation, risk, and execution.
An adaptive RCM framework should:
As Standard Fusion’s 2025 compliance roadmap puts it, “organizations must become proactive and strategic in their response to regulatory change—embedding governance, workflow automation, and cultural alignment”.
When executed well, regulatory change management transforms from cost to capability. Firms that adapt early can:
This approach aligns with the view of operational resilience: “the ability not only to prevent and adapt to shocks, but to learn and transform through them”.
Ultimately, resilience is not achieved by avoiding regulation—it’s achieved by mastering it.
Regulatory change is no longer a background function. It is a living component of operational risk, demanding continuous attention, automation, and strategic ownership. Organizations that rely solely on manual compliance will find themselves perpetually reacting; those that build adaptive frameworks will transform compliance into an operational advantage.
Resilient organizations are not those with fewer regulations—but those that can evolve with them.
Schedule a demo, to see how adaptive compliance can become part of your operational resilience strategy.
Try Pirani now, create your free account 👇
Want to learn more about risk management? You may be interested in this content 👇