Operational risk management (ORM) is evolving fast. After a decade dominated by compliance and incident response, regulators in the U.S. and Canada are shifting toward a new standard: operational resilience.
Resilience goes beyond identifying and mitigating risks—it’s about proving that an organization can continue delivering critical operations even under disruption.
From cyber incidents to third-party outages, recent events have shown that risk mitigation alone is not enough; resilience must be demonstrated, tested, and documented.
As the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) states in its Cybersecurity and Financial System Resilience Report 2025, banks are now expected to “identify critical operations, map dependencies, set impact tolerances, and test their ability to recover” under realistic scenarios.
|
Content |
In the U.S., the OCC, Federal Reserve, and FFIEC have converged around one principle: resilience is the ultimate proof of operational soundness.
Institutions must:
Canada has followed a similar path. The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) introduced Guideline B-13: Technology and Cyber Risk Management—effective since January 2024—which sets clear expectations for resilience and dependency management across all federally regulated financial institutions. OSFI frames technology and cyber resilience as inseparable from operational risk, emphasizing governance, testing, and oversight of third-party services.
A common misconception is that resilience is just a new label for continuity planning.
In reality, business continuity focuses on restoring services after a disruption, while operational resilience is about ensuring that those disruptions have limited impact in the first place.
According to the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s Principles for Operational Resilience (2021), the objective is to “build the ability to deliver critical operations through disruption.”
Resilience therefore requires a holistic view: critical business functions, technology assets, data flows, third-party providers, and people must all be mapped, interconnected, and stress-tested.
Operational resilience is not a standalone program—it’s the natural evolution of ORM.
The best-in-class organizations integrate resilience metrics and testing into their existing risk frameworks.
A practical approach includes:
Deloitte calls this shift a strategic imperative: firms that embed resilience into ORM “gain not only regulatory readiness but also competitive agility,” since they can adapt faster to change.
As noted by Deloitte Global in Operational Resilience: The Cornerstone of Modern Organizations (2025), resilience is increasingly viewed as a business enabler rather than a compliance requirement. Organizations that embed resilience into their operational risk frameworks strengthen both their regulatory readiness and strategic adaptability, enabling them to respond faster to disruption and maintain stakeholder confidence.
Proving resilience demands real-time visibility. Spreadsheets and static reports can’t show whether an organization can actually withstand disruption. Modern ORM platforms—like Pirani—help teams operationalize resilience by:
This turns resilience from a compliance checkbox into a continuous capability—measurable, reportable, and improvable.
The major AWS outage of October 2025, which affected banking apps, airlines, and logistics platforms across North America, reinforced that operational resilience cannot rely on single-provider strategies.
Regulators now expect firms to demonstrate multi-region, multi-vendor architectures and recovery playbooks aligned with their declared tolerances.
Similarly, incidents like the Alaska Airlines IT failures (2025) and National Bank of Canada digital banking downtime (2025) underline the value of tested, traceable recovery processes. Each event revealed that operational resilience is not about avoiding disruption—but about proving control when it happens.
OSFI’s latest guidelines—B-10 (Third-Party Risk) and B-13 (Technology and Cyber)—are reshaping how Canadian institutions view operational risk. They require a single, enterprise-wide model that integrates third-party oversight, technology governance, and resilience testing.
Capco summarizes this shift: “B-13 extends beyond cybersecurity—it establishes resilience as a measurable capability across technology and operations.” For global organizations operating in both markets, aligning OCC and OSFI expectations under one ORM framework is now a regulatory advantage.
Operational resilience is no longer a buzzword—it’s the regulator’s benchmark for operational soundness. Institutions that can map their critical processes, define impact tolerances, and test their responses are demonstrating a higher level of risk maturity.
Technology plays a decisive role. With platforms like Pirani, organizations can move from fragmented documentation to a living, evidence-based ORM ecosystem that proves resilience before, during, and after disruption.
The next era of risk management won’t be judged by how few incidents you have, but by how fast and transparently you recover.
To learn more about how to design and implement an operational resilience framework, download our free eBook: Operational Resilience and How to Achieve It in Your Organization
Want to learn more about risk management? You may be interested in this content 👇